The Paradox of God's Grace and Justice in the Midst of Idolatry and a Broken World...
Saturday, 27 April 2013
The Problem of Forgiveness, Righteousness, and Self-Loathing
We all fall short of God's ideal completely and absolutely. This reality has sometimes caused us to think that
if we let God know how bad we think we are, he will like us more. We forget that forgiveness is not conditioned by anything we do. If it were conditional no one would make it. Our pride makes us loathe this reality. It is a great and humiliating gift. We so desperately want to contribute something to God's unconditional gift that we will even try to offer the pain of our self-accusation and self-rejection. The prodigal son was not saved because of his humiliation, but because of his Father's unconditional love. We want God to see how unworthy we feel, and the anxiety of our despair and guilt. We perform emotional works of self-punishment because we think this is what God is asking us to contribute. But God's grace is independent of anything we do, even our self-accusation and self-punishment. Forgiveness creates repentance, not the other way around.
Friday, 26 April 2013
The Problem with Christian and Muslim "Fundamentalists"
Fundamentalists like Muslim Egyptian Sayyid Qutb and American Christians like John Hagee and Dyson Hague are trying to compete with modern rationalism’s search for objective reality by declaring their interpretation of scripture to be their own supposed objective realities of pure revelation.
While the Quran and the Bible have always been seen as God’s Word and therefore true, by Muslims and Christianity respectively, understanding the interpretation of scripture as a complex weaving of lenses and methodologies has almost always existed to some degree. This traditional reality is often ignored by these fundamentalist. This is not to say that all methods of interpretation should or have been accepted as legitimate, but even within an Orthodox perspective both Islam and Christianity have made room for a variety of interpretations within the central tenets of their faith.
The categorical definition of “fundamentalist” being referred to in Christianity has specific roots in early 20th century Protestant movement which sought to hold onto to the supposed “fundamentals” of the Christian faith against supposed liberal theology and secular reason based criticism support The categorical definition for Fundamentalist in Islam refers to the early 20th century subsets of Islam which sought to emphasize Islamic law as something which should be forced onto a society, and exists outside of an interpretative framework. For these specific sects, it often means that God is revealing the truth of scripture to them in such a specific way that they refuse to allow any other theologians to reason with them, and usually damage the society along with the religion in which they dwell...
Thursday, 25 April 2013
Injustice In The Quran And The Bible
God allows humanity the freedom
to sin or make mistakes even as he is patiently pushing us toward his ideal. God
meets us where we are at. We will always be free to sin, and God will always
try and work with the mistakes that we make. In 1 Samuel 8 God’s people demand
that he give them a monarchy even as he warns them of the corruption and
violence it will create. Even in the most obscene instances of our injustice
God tries to make the world a little more just. In Deuteronomy 22:28-29 God
commands that if a man rapes a woman, he must marry her. From our perspective
today this is seen as a horrific injustice. Yet in the historical context of
the ancient scripture a woman’s virginity was her central possession, and it
would be more of an injustice for her to lose it without the promise and
protection of marriage.Despite how unjust we may make society, God is always looking for a way to
bring justice, however limited that justice may be in order to allow us our
freedom to sin.
Muslim
theologian Amina Wadud is in agreement with many Christian theologians today that men and women were originally created equal based
on her reading of the creation story in the Quran.
Sura 4:1 declares men and woman to be created from the same divine substance
and they are equal in the eyes of God. Yet just one verse later in Sura 4:2 the
Quran states that man can marry up to “two, three or four” women who have no
homes to protect them. The central condition of this is that the man must treat
all of them fairly and justly, and if they cannot do so then they are called to
marry “only one, to prevent you from doing injustice.” For Wadud God’s ideal
marriage is about harmony “which is mutually built with love and mercy.” However, God is also patient with society’s
“cruel heart” and “inability to submit to truth and justice.”
The Quran is doing something similar to Deuteronomy 22:28-29 in this instance.
In the patriarchal context of a woman being primarily an economic resource,
those who have no protection through marriage should be provided protection by
the grace of God. The ideal is that men and women are equal, however God will
once again allow us to operate out of our sinful context, even it means there
will be some measure of injustice for the time being. From this perspective,
Wadud declares that:
Evolution in society which is
indicated in the Qur'an that explains why many Muslim countries have instituted further
legal and social reforms with regard to women. These reforms operate outside the
literal content of some Qur'anic passages and make modifications on the basis
of greater Qur'anic intent with respect to such issues as repudiation,
polygamy, inheritance, and the rules for witnessing, etc.[5]
For Wadud it only makes sense that
countries trying to be faithful to the ideal of the Quran would continue to
push toward a greater sense of gender equality. Most of what the Quran and the
Bible depict is not the ideal, but it is alluding to a greater telos in God’s story of redemption.
Slavery and the oppression of women are a reality throughout the Bible, yet we
can see signs of God pointing toward a larger story of justice and love
throughout the Biblical narrative in both the Old and New Testament. Yet both
Scriptures point toward a creational beginning where there is peace, justice,
and a proper social order.
William J. Webb, Slaves, women & homosexuals : exploring the hermeneutics of cultural analysis (Downers Grove, Intervarsity Press, 2001) 14
Phyllis Trible, God
and the rhetoric of sexuality, (Fortress Press, Chicago, 1978) 15-22; Amina
Wadud, Quran and woman: Rereading the sacred text
from a woman's perspective. (New York, Oxford University Press.) 19-21; N.T. Wright Women’s
service in the church: The Biblical Basis. (September 4 2004) http://ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Women_Service_Church.htm
Sura 30:21; Sura 4:128
(Wadud 1999) 82
(Wadud 1999) 82
Labels:
Amina Wadud,
Bible,
Christianity,
creation,
gender equality,
HermeneuticTrajectory,
Injustice,
Islam,
marriage,
metanarrative,
N.T. Wright,
patriarchy,
Quran,
rape,
redemption,
sin,
telos,
violence,
William Webb
Monday, 25 February 2013
Idolatry and Heavenly Escape
The
Orthodox Christian lives in a strange tension. While the death, resurrection
and ascension of Christ makes all things right and under his authoritative kingdom,
the creation still longs for this final consummation.[1] The
prolepsis within the Christian tradition has often made it difficult for the
Church to know how to understand, share, and live out the Gospel. How do we
declare that the world is being made new when all around us we see endless violence,
sadness, and death? What does the fully sufficient and complete work of the
Cross have to do with us living lives of peace and justice?
Labels:
Christ,
consummation,
David Yeago,
earth,
Eschatology,
evil,
good creation,
idolatry,
Kingdom of God,
Liberation Theology,
N.T. Wright,
peace,
Postliberal,
proplepsis,
Social Justice,
Soteriological escapism
Monday, 14 January 2013
The Otherness of God
Everything we do has God’s signature on it.
Our lives are so intricately tied with God sometimes this can cause us to think
that God needs us, that we can change his mind, and influence his decision
making process.
Labels:
creation,
creator,
evil,
glory,
God,
king,
otherness,
perfection,
suffering,
transcendence,
Trinity
Wednesday, 9 January 2013
The Fallacy of Modern Marriage
Our culture is obsessed with individualistic love. I am obsessed
with it. I blame it on disney. We get married as a symbol of our
love to one person. But that is NOT the purpose of marriage...
with it. I blame it on disney. We get married as a symbol of our
love to one person. But that is NOT the purpose of marriage...
Thursday, 3 January 2013
Creation based Gender Equality in the Quran and the Bible
For Christian theologian Phyllis Trible Genesis 1:27 is the central biblical clue for how to
understand the whole of the biblical metanarrative: So God created
mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male
and female he created them.
While Muslim theologian Amina Wadud observes that in the Quranic version of the story the genders relate to God and themselves in God’s creating them from the same genderless soul. While both versions have slight nuance, both show the equality of the genders from the beginning of their creation...
Labels:
Amina Wadud,
Bible,
child bearing,
compatible,
creation,
design,
dominion,
equality,
gender,
helpers,
humanity,
image of God,
male and female,
nafs,
Phyllis Trible,
Quran,
soul,
viceregent
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)